PFs Should Take Liability Far More Often Than Anyone Expected

security

Based on analysis of the payment facilitator model, payments consultant Todd Ablowitz is arguing that payment facilitators need to take on liability a lot more often than they might think.

“Taking the risk as a PF is a choice. Do I take the liability or let the acquirer take the liability?” Ablowitz said during the keynote at PF day last week. “It doesn’t have a dial. You can have a dial on fraud and you can have a dial on credit, but you can’t have a dial on how much risk tolerance you have for regulatory. You always have to be on point there. (If you don’t), your acquirer will beat you up, the regulators will drag you through the mud and take you to court. You don’t want it.”

Because of the model, a partner—be they acquirer or a super ISO or something else—may want to avoid the liability.

“So I’m a (PF) and let’s say I’m making 2.6 percent net revenue and and let’s say that equates to 2 percent bottom line. You can make a logical argument that if I’ve got one new merchant that has less than a two percent chance of going under or causing me losses, I should take a risk on them,” he argued. He then pointed out that it’s rare that a merchant could have more than a 15 basis point chargeback rate without causing consumer harm – thus causing unacceptable regulatory risk.

“The PF says, ‘I want my merchant to get approved’ and their upstream says ‘I don’t want that merchant. It’s too high risk!'” If the upstream is only making 30 or 40 basis points and they are asked to approve a merchant that exposes them to 15 basis points of risk, versus their normal risk tolerance of 1 or 2, they just won’t agree. “Therefore,” Ablowitz said, “There is an economic argument for why” the PF should assume the liability.

2 thoughts on “PFs Should Take Liability Far More Often Than Anyone Expected”

  1. That’s a good economic argument. I guess it matters when the merchant causes a loss and what the loss amount is in relation to fees earned up to that point. But if the PF margin is 2% and the upstream partner .3%, the PF will have a higher risk tolerance, assuming they are well capitalized.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Click here to go directly to the site
or wait 0 seconds
.

Sign up to stay in touch!

Sign up to get interesting news and updates delivered to your inbox.


By submitting this form, you are granting: PaymentFacilitator.com, 7741 S Glencoe Ct., Centennial, CO, 80122, permission to email you. You may unsubscribe via the link found at the bottom of every email. (See our Email Privacy Policy (http://constantcontact.com/legal/privacy-statement) for details.) Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.

Sign up to stay in touch!

Sign up to get interesting news and updates delivered to your inbox.


By submitting this form, you are granting: PaymentFacilitator.com, 7741 S Glencoe Ct., Centennial, CO, 80122, permission to email you. You may unsubscribe via the link found at the bottom of every email. (See our Email Privacy Policy (http://constantcontact.com/legal/privacy-statement) for details.) Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
Click here to go directly to the site
or wait 0 seconds
.